Dolphin park
Why I think I may keep my FE16-35mmf2.8GM although I really hate its extending barrel design:
If you compare this GM version of Sony 16-35mm vs the ZA version , you can clearly see the resolution difference in the edges and corners , even in the very central part of the image at any aperture setting, but if you do compare printed images from these two FE 16-35mm zooms , you can hardly see any resolution difference, you can still see color and overall rendering differences , though.
So I was almost trying to convince myself to keep the cheaper ZA or the Tamron version and sell this GM zoom.....but I realized that the resolution difference especially in the central portion of the FF would be glaring enough to just justify the extra cost and inconvenience of this zoom.
I think the GM produces much cleaner images even at image level, the ZA produces too much lateral CA in the edges especially in high contrast areas.
Also at the 35mm and even 28mm , the resolution difference is very clear, sometimes even striking, it easy to tell and very glaring to me.
Compared to the Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 at f4 or f5 at 28mm , I think even the cheap Sony F4 ZA is slightly better in the very central part of the frame and in the edges and borders they are almost identical.
At f8 or so the ZA Sony edges out the Tamron in the corners.
It was surprising to me. I always thought the Tamron was just as good as the GM as many DPR guys and many Fred Miranda forum denizens talked about that. I think I was kinda brainwashed by their very biased wishful conclusions.
So , after testing a several copies of these lenses , I think the GM is definitely worth the price(if you use the 16-35mm range very often like I do). I still have both the Tamron and the GM now , I was selling the GM but decided to cancel it. I mean I do not think they are even comparable with respect to resolution and flare performance.
I dislike the build quality of the FE16-35mm f2.8GM but it is sharp and optically a very good zoom. And most importantly it works great for my type of shooting at least for my weather documentary series like this series.
So I may have to stick with the GM for now , I think until the FE16-35mm f2.8GM mark 2 released(or even better 14-30mm f2.8 GM). And I think it will be about a couple more years or so away from now. I have heard a few rumors about the new version of 24-70mm f2.8 GM , and Sony seems to think it is the main priority and most important release for them as they want to get into the PJ market.
Well I think it is the right thing for them to do now as their current 24-70mm f2.8 GM is really a weak lens by their current lens quality standard, compare that mediocre lens to their recent releases like the new FE35mm f1.4GM (which is almost flawless lens at least resolution wise) or the FE135mm f1.8GM, it is really glaring. The FE24-70mm f2.8GM the FE85mm f1.4 GM and the FE70-20mm f2.8GM are the current worst Sony lenses and now they really need to update these three terrible GM lenses.
I really want to see the highly anticipated FE85mm f1.4GM MK2 in the size of the Sigma 85mm f1.4Dn or even a bit smaller.
I think they can do it now , and if they do that it will be a huge hit for sure. For me a set of great 85, 28mm (35mm may work too, but I prefer a great 28mm f1.8 or 1.4), 20mm primes are really important , now we have a set of great 35, 135, 105mm, 100, but we do not have any good 85 , 28 and 200mm primes.
I think Sony really needs a good 200mm f4G or f2.8GM or G, a great 150mm macro, 17mm f4 TS, 45mm f4 TS, 135mm or 120mm f4 TS, and 14 or 15-35mm f2.8 GM or even f4G... then the E system is almost completed.
I think the Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 is really overrated , it is not as good as the GM and might even be a bit worse than the best copies of the FE16-35mm f4ZA(which is not really bad stopped down especially in the 16-24mm range). If you do not need f4 and shoot always stopped down then the FE16-35mm f4ZA is actually a better lens than the Tamron.
The zoom range of the 16-35mm is much more versatile than the Tamron 17-28 and these two cheap wide zooms are optically identical.....very close.
Then why did I have to sell the FE12-24mm f2.8 GM?
Well I just hated its ergonomics design. It simply never worked for me. Plus the range was too short and that forced me to change lenses too often.
My copy of the FE12-24mm f2.8GM was sharp super sharp but it had a huge bulbous front element and that really made it a risky lens to use in the field as I always used that lens for my weather documentary series.
So I sold it. I really want to get a hypothetical great sharp 14-35mm f4 GM zoom without the annoying bulbous front element design. Canon could do it , so why not try it Sony?
I also tried the Sony FE14mm f1.8 GM as it was kinda reasonably priced for that super fast wide prime, but it was shockingly bad at f5.6 and on......I mean at f5.6 this zoom FE16-35mm f2.8GM at 16mm seemed a bit sharper than the 14mm prime. Plus, it also had the annoying bulbous front element design.
And as with all these lenses with a bulbous front element , it has serious flare issue.
So it did not work for me, now I am waiting for Voigtlander to update their 15mm prime , yeah it is dark but it is quite sharp if you get a good copy and it has amazing anti-flare coatings.
