لێکۆڵەرانى مێژووى کورد---Kurdish History Researchers

            The main mistake and - at the same time - the main principle
Theses (Soran Hama Rash)
Soran Hama Rash Gate to identify Kurdish origins and connect them to the Sumerians and other ancient peoples of the region; It is neither the genetic gate (which I don't think did any work in this respect), nor the archaeological gate (I think it used minimal archaeological materials).
Rather, it is mainly the linguistic gateway: random comparison of Kurdish words with Sumerian words, without knowing the scientific method of linguistic comparison.
In addition; Even if comparisons are made and words are found in Sumerian that are distantly related to Kurdish words; Still, that would be evidence of the distant kinship of the two languages, which go back to an ancient grandmother language through their own roots (as we will discuss at another opportunity). However, he did not understand the concept of language kinship and their classification according to language families; These relative words and common roots prove that the ancient language is Sumerian; He's still Kurdish!
That’s a very slanted logic. It is ignorance of the first lesson of historical linguistics and comparative linguistics.
What linguistics student (not to mention teachers) would make the mistake of considering relatives and common roots as evidence that the language is part of this language?!
What about the concept of linguistic kinship, the classification of languages ​​into language families, and the classification of language families into language families?
What about historical and comparative linguistics?!
This lowly thinking is like being a Persian and after comparing some Persian words with some Kurdish words of the same root, he says that Kurdish is part of Persian and any Persian dialect! Or vice versa: a Kurdish person who compares several Kurdish words with several Persian words and says that Persian is part of Kurdish and any Kurdish dialect! Unfortunately, this thinking is common and very common.
This is a very central and very fundamental principle in S. Hama Rash's thinking and writing. On this basis (and with some superficial and artificial comparisons between Kurdish and Sumerian words) he made Sumerian part of Kurdish, and the whole Anatolian wing (Hittite, Luwi, Carian, Lydian, etc.) of the Indo-European language family and before that the Iranian branch of the Indo-Iranian wing made it part of Kurdish! Instead, he obviously considers the Indo-European language to be part of Kurdish, which is another joke to be discussed in another article.
Thus, the Kurdish language has become a huge black hole, swallowing not only the star of several languages, but also the galaxy of several language families.
Finally, he cannot tell us what language family Kurdish belongs to?! Because he did not understand the concept of language family from the beginning.
   

Taken on: July 18, 2024

Tags:

Kurds

returning

🔥🔥🔥'

Good

Thoughts

Words

Deeds!'

زێوه‌

مه‌رگه‌ڤه‌ر

ورمێ

1985

ئۆردوگای

زیوه

ئازادی

خەبات،

هەولێر،

ڪورد

ڪوردســتان

Paris

Festivala

çanda

Kurd

Parîsê

Film

GENOCIDE

genocide.Anfal

شورشی

گولان

KRG

France

#CejnaZimaneKurdi

#Shanidar

#Şanîdar

#Kurdistan

#Neanderthal

Qamişlo

ERBIL

ROJAVA

Rojhelat

Koerdistan

PESHMERGA

ARBIL

Silêmanî

Serdeşt

Duhok

Dîlok

FREEDOM

HerêmaKurdistanê

HALABJA

Hewler

KURDISH

Kurdistani

Kurdistán-

KURDISTANê

LOVE

Lalish

LOVES

Zaxo

Zagros

xebat

Xaneqînê

ExCapture

Xanê

Colemerg

Bokan

NEWROZ

NATURE

Newrozê

Mesopotamia

Mêrdîn

Mehabad « less

Sets appears in: • kurdistan 2024 • Women Life Freedom more » • Kurdistan is one part, not four • kurd û Kurdistan • kurdistan Turkey • One Kurdistan • KURDISTAN Iran • kurdistan • kurdene • kurdiskae • Nature & Landscapes kurdistan • kurd kurdistan « less

Groups appears in: • Solidarity

Stats: 588 views