Apologies from Britain to the whole world for the damage caused to science by Charles Darwin

"Chinese socialism is founded upon Darwin and the theory of evolution." Mao Tse-tung (1893 – 1976). Kampf um Mao's Erbe (1977)

On behalf of Britain, I ask the whole world to accept the sincere apologies of the British people, for the damage done to science by Charles Darwin.
Britain has a great scientific heritage, having produced some of the world's finest, and greatest scientists. However, Britain's enormous contribution to science has been seriously sullied by the false ideas popularised by Charles Darwin, which have led to a serious decline in scientific integrity, and spawned a whole catalogue of fakes, frauds and very dubious science.

Although it has been evident for some time that Darwinian, progressive evolution is not scientifically credible, and that there is a great deal of evidence against it, the idea has now developed a life of its own, and has become an essential lynch pin in an ideological agenda. As a consequence, there is no longer any normal, scientific objectivity permitted and Darwinism has become uniquely sacrosanct. This is very damaging to genuine scientific endeavour, and has the effect of creating a virtual straitjacket, for any field of research that is likely to have any adverse implications for Darwinism.

So, what is the truth about Darwinian, progressive (microbes to human) evolution?

The fact is, as we will show later, there is no credible mechanism for progressive evolution.

What exactly was the erroneous idea that Darwin popularised?
Darwin believed that there is unlimited variability in the gene pool of all creatures and plants. And that this unlimited variabilty has, over vast time, transformed an original, living cell into humans (and every other living thing) through natural selection of beneficial and advantageous traits.

However, the changes possible were well known by selective breeders to be strictly limited.
This is because the changes seen in selective breeding are due to the shuffling, deletion and emphasis of genetic information already existing in the gene pool (micro-evolution). There is no viable mechanism for creating new, beneficial, genetic information required to create entirely new structures and features (macro-evolution), or to create the massive amount of new information required to transform an original, single living cell into all the complex, life forms (including humans) that exist.

Darwin rashly ignored the limits which were well known to breeders (even though he selectively bred pigeons himself, and should have known better). He simply extrapolated the strictly limited, minor changes observed in selective breeding to major, unlimited, progressive changes able to create new structures, organs etc. through natural selection, over millions of years.
Of course, the length of time involved made no difference, the existing, genetic information could not increase of its own accord, no matter how long the timescale.

That was a gigantic flaw in Darwinism, and opponents of Darwin's ideas tried to argue that changes were limited, as selective breeding had demonstrated. But because Darwinism had acquired a status more akin to an ideology than purely, objective science, belief in the Darwinian idea outweighed the verdict of observational and experimental science, and classical Darwinism became firmly established as scientific orthodoxy for nearly a century.

Opponents continued to argue all this time, that Darwinism was unscientific nonsense, but they were ostracised and dismissed as cranks, weirdoes or religious fanatics.
Finally however, it was discovered that the opponents of Darwin were perfectly correct - and that constructive, genetic changes (progressive, macro-evolution) require new, additional, genetic information.
This looked like the ignominious end of Darwinism, as there was no credible, natural mechanism able to create new, constructive, genetic information. And Darwinism should have been heading for the dustbin of history,

However, rather than ditch the whole idea, the vested interests in Darwinism had become so great, with numerous, lifelong careers and an ideological agenda which had become dependant on the Darwinian belief system, a desperate attempt was made to rescue it from its justified demise.
A mechanism had to be invented to explain the origin of new, constructive information.
That invented mechanism was 'mutations'. Mutations are ... genetic, copying MISTAKES.

The general public had already been convinced that classical Darwinism was a scientific fact, and that anyone who questioned it was a crank, so all that had to be done, as far as the public was concerned, was to give the impression that the theory had simply been refined and updated in the light of modern science.
The fact that classical Darwinism had been wrong all along, and was fatally flawed from the outset was kept quiet. This meant that the opponents of Darwinism, who had been right all along, and were the real champions of science, continued to be vilified as cranks and scorned by the mass media and establishment.

The new developments were simply portrayed as the evolution and development of the theory. The impression was given that there was nothing wrong with the idea of progressive (macro) evolution, it had simply 'evolved' and 'improved' in the light of greater knowledge.
A sort of progressive evolution of the idea of evolution.

This new, 'improved' Darwinism became known as Neo-Darwinism.

So what is Neo-Darwinism? And did it really solve the fatal flaws of the Darwinian idea?

Neo Darwinism is progressive, macro evolution - as Darwin had proposed, but based on the ludicrous idea that random mutations (accidental, genetic, copying mistakes) selected by natural selection, can provide the constructive, genetic information capable of creating entirely new features, anatomical structures, organs, and biological systems. In other words, it is macro evolution based on a belief in a total progression from microbes to man through billions of random, genetic, copying MISTAKES, over millions of years.
However, there is no evidence for it whatsoever, and it is should be classified as unscientific nonsense which defies logic, the laws of probability, the law of cause and effect and Information Theory.

People can be confused, because they know that 'micro'-evolution is an observable fact, which everyone accepts. However, evolutionists cynically exploit that confusion by frequently citing obvious examples of micro-evolution such as: the Peppered Moth, Darwin's finches, so-called superbugs etc., as evidence of macro-evolution.
Of course such examples are not evidence of macro-evolution at all. The public is being hoodwinked, and it is a disgrace to science. There are no observable examples or evidence of macro-evolution and no examples of a mutation, or a series of mutations capable of creating entirely new structures, body parts, organs etc. and that is a fact. It is no wonder that W R Thompson stated in the preface to the 1959 centenary edition of Darwin's Origin of the Species, that ... the success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific integrity.

Micro-evolution is simply the small changes which take place, through natural selection or selective breeding, but only within the strict limits of the built-in variability of the existing gene pool. Any constructive changes outside the extent of the existing gene pool requires a credible mechanism for the creation of new, beneficial, genetic information, that is essential for macro evolution.
Micro evolution does not involve or require the creation of any new, genetic information. So micro evolution and macro evolution are entirely different. There is no connection between them at all, whatever evolutionists may claim.
Once people fully understand that the differences they see in various dogs breeds, for example, are merely an example of limited micro-evolution (selection of existing genetic information) and nothing to do with progressive macro-evolution, they begin to realise that they have been fed an incredible story. The dogs remain dogs and will always remain dogs, hundreds of years of experiment and observation through selective breeding confirms that.

To explain further.... Neo-Darwinian, macro evolution is the incredible notion that everything in the genome of humans and every living thing past and present (apart from the original genetic information in the very first living cell) is the result of the accumulation of millions of genetic, copying mistakes..... mutations accruing upon previous mutations .... on and, and on, and on.

In other words, Neo-Darwinism proposes that the complete genome (every scrap of genetic information in the DNA) of every living thing that has ever lived was created by a long series ... of mistakes upon mistakes .... of mistakes .... of mistakes etc. etc.

If we look at the whole picture we soon realise that what is actually being proposed by evolutionists is that, apart from the original information in the first living cell (and evolutionists have yet to explain where that original information came from?) - every additional scrap of genetic information for all - features, structures, body parts, systems and processes that exist, or have ever existed in all living things, such as:
skin, bones, bone joints, shells, flowers, leaves, wings, scales, muscles, fur, hair, teeth, claws, toe and finger nails, horns, beaks, nervous systems, blood, blood vessels, brains, lungs, hearts, digestive systems, vascular systems, liver, kidneys, pancreas, bowels, immune systems, senses, eyes, ears, sex organs, sexual reproduction, sperm, eggs, pollen, the process of metamorphosis, marsupial pouches, marsupial embryo migration, mammary glands, hormone production, melanin etc. .... have been created from scratch, by an incredibly long series of small, accumulated mistakes ... mistake - upon mistake - upon mistake - upon mistake - over and over again, millions of times. That is ... every part, system and process of all living things are the result of literally billions of genetic MISTAKES of MISTAKES, accumulated over many millions of years.

So what we are asked to believe is that something like a vascular system, or reproductive organs, developed in small, random, incremental steps, with every step being the result of a copying mistake, and with each step being able to provide a significant survival or reproductive advantage in order to be preserved and become dominant in the gene pool. Incredible!
If you believe that ... you will believe anything.

Even worse, evolutionists have yet to cite a single example of a positive, beneficial, mutation which adds constructive information to the genome of any creature. Yet they expect us to believe that we have been converted from an original, single living cell into humans by an accumulation of billions of beneficial mutations (mistakes).

Conclusion:
Progressive, microbes-to-man evolution is impossible - there is no credible mechanism to produce all the new, genetic information which is essential for that to take place.
The evolution story is an obvious fairy tale presented as scientific fact.

However, nothing has changed - those who dare to question Neo-Darwinism are still portrayed as idiots, retards, cranks, weirdoes, anti-scientific ignoramuses or religious fanatics.
Want to join the club?

What about the fossil record?

The formation of fossils.

Books explaining how fossils are formed frequently give the impression that it takes many years of build up of layers of sediment to bury organic remains, which then become fossilised.
Therefore many people don't realise that this impression is erroneous, because it is a fact that all good, intact fossils require rapid burial in sufficient sediment to prevent decay or predatory destruction.
So it is evident that rock containing good, undamaged fossils was laid down rapidly, sometimes in catastrophic conditions.

The very existence of intact fossils is a testament to rapid burial and sedimentation.
You don't get fossils from slow burial. Organic remains don't just sit around on the sea bed, or elsewhere, waiting for sediment to cover them a millimetre at a time, over a long period.
Unless they are buried rapidly, they would soon be damaged or destroyed by predation and/or decay.
The fact that so many sedimentary rocks contain fossils, indicates that the sediment that created them was normally laid down within a short time.
Another important factor is that many large fossils (tree trunks, large fish, dinosaurs etc.) intersect several or many strata (sometimes called layers) which clearly indicates that multiple strata were formed simultaneously in a single event by grading/segregation of sedimentary particles into distinct layers, and not stratum by stratum over long periods of time or different geological eras, which is the evolutionist's, uniformitarian interpretation of the geological column.
In view of the fact that many large fossils required a substantial amount of sediment to bury them, and the fact that they intersect multiple strata (polystrate fossils), how can any sensible person claim that strata or, for that matter, any fossil bearing rock, could have taken millions of years to form?
You don't even need to be a qualified sedimentologist or geologist to come to that conclusion, it is common sense.

Rapid formation of strata - latest evidence:
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157635944904973/

All creatures and plants alive today, which are found as fossils, are the same in their fossil form as the living examples, in spite of the fact that the fossils are claimed to be millions of years old. So all living things today could be called 'living fossils' inasmuch as there is no evidence of any evolutionary changes in the alleged multi-million year timescale. The fossil record shows either extinct species or unchanged species, that is all.

Living Fossils - when NO evidence IS evidence.
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/15157133658

The Cambrian Explosion.
Trilobites and other many creatures appeared suddenly in some of the earliest rocks of the fossil record, with no intermediate ancestors. This sudden appearance of a great variety of advanced, fully developed creatures is called the Cambrian Explosion. Trilobites are especially interesting because they have complex eyes, which would need a lot of progressive evolution to develop such advanced features However, there is no evidence of any evolution leading up to the Cambrian Explosion, and that is a serious dilemma for evolutionists.
Trilobites are now thought to be extinct, although it is possible that similar creatures could still exist in unexplored parts of deep oceans.

See fossil of a crab unchanged after many millions of years:
www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/12702046604/in/set-72...

Fossil museum: www.flickr.com/photos/101536517@N06/sets/72157641367196613/

What about all the claimed scientific evidence that evolutionists have found for evolution?

The evolutionist 'scientific' method has resulted in a serious decline in scientific integrity, and has given us such scientific abominations as:

Piltdown Man (a fake),
Nebraska Man (a pig),
South West Colorado Man (a horse),
Orce man (a donkey),
Embryonic Recapitulation (a fraud),
Archaeoraptor (a fake),
Java Man (a giant gibbon),
Peking Man (a monkey),
Montana Man (an extinct dog-like creature)
Nutcracker Man (an extinct type of ape - Australopithecus)
The Horse Series (unrelated species cobbled together),
Peppered Moth (faked photographs)
The Orgueil meteorite (faked evidence)
Etc. etc.

Anyone can call anything 'science' ... it doesn't make it so.
All these examples were trumpeted by evolutionists as scientific evidence for evolution.
Do we want to trust evolutionists claims about scientific evidence, when they have such an appalling record?

Just how good are peer reviews of scientific papers?
www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full
www.examiner.com/article/want-to-publish-science-paper-ju...

Piltdown Man reigned for over 40 years, as a supreme example of human evolution, before it was exposed as a crudely, fashioned fake.
Is that 'science'?

The ludicrous Hopeful Monster Theory and so-called Punctuated Equilibrium (evolution in big jumps) were invented by evolutionists as a desperate attempt to explain away the lack of fossil evidence for evolution. They are proposed methods of evolution which, it is claimed, need no fossil evidence. They are actually an admission that the required fossil evidence does not exist.

Piltdown Man... survived as alleged proof of evolution for over 40 years in evolution textbooks and was taught in schools and universities, it survived peer reviews etc. and used as supposed, irrefutable evidence for evolution at the famous Scopes Trial (subject of the film 'Inherit the Wind').

Nebraska Man, this was a single tooth of a peccary. it was trumpeted as scientific evidence for the evolution of humans, and artists impressions of an ape-like man appeared in newspapers magazines etc. Such 'scientific' evidence is enough to make any genuine, respectable scientist weep. Having been found 3 years earlier, it was 'resurrected' by evolutionists just before the Scopes Trial in order to influence public opinion in advance of the trial.

South West Colorado Man, another tooth .... of a horse this time... It was presented as evidence for human evolution.

Orce man, a fragment of skullcap, which was most likely from a donkey, but even if it was human. such a tiny fragment is certainly not any proof of human evolution as it was made out to be.

Embryonic Recapitulation, the evolutionist zealot Ernst Haeckel (who was a hero of Hitler) published fraudulent drawings of embryos and his theory was readily accepted by evolutionists as proof of evolution. Even after he was exposed as a fraudster, evolutionists still continued to use his fraudulent evidence in books and publications on evolution, including school textbooks, until very recently.

Archaeoraptor, A so-called feathered dinosaur from the Chinese fossil faking industry. It managed to fool credulous evolutionists, because it was exactly what they were looking for. The evidence fitted the wishful thinking.

Java Man, Dubois, the man who discovered Java Man and declared it a human ancestor ..... admitted much later that it was actually a giant gibbon, however, that spoilt the evolution story which had been built up around it, so evolutionists were reluctant to get rid of it, and still maintained it was a human ancestor. Dubois had also 'forgotten' to mention that he found the bones of modern humans at the same site.

Peking Man, made up from monkey skulls which were found in an ancient limestone burning industrial site where there were crushed monkey skulls and modern human bones. Drawings were made of Peking Man, but the original skull conveniently disappeared. So that allowed evolutionists to continue to use it as evidence without fear of it ever being debunked.

The Horse Series, unrelated species cobbled together, They were from different continents and were in no way a proper series of intermediates, They had different numbers of ribs etc. and the very first in the line, is similar to a creature alive today - the Hyrax.

Peppered Moth, moths were glued to trees to fake photographs for the peppered moth evidence. They don't normally rest on trees in daytime. In any case, the selection of a trait which is part of the variability of the existing gene pool, is not progressive evolution. It is just normal, natural selection within limits, which no-one disputes.

The Orgueil meteorite, organic material and even plant seeds were embedded and glued into the Orgueil meteorite and disguised with coal dust to make them look like part of the original meteorite, in a fraudulent attempt to fool the world into believing in the discredited idea of spontaneous generation of life, which is essential for progressive evolution to get started. The reasoning being that, if it could be shown that there was life in space, spontaneous generation must have happened there and could therefore be declared by evolutionists as being a scientific fact.

Is macro evolution even science? The answer to that has to be an emphatic - NO!
The usual definition of science is: that which can be demonstrated and observed and repeated. Evolution cannot be proved, or tested; it is claimed to have happened in the past, and, as such, it is not subject to the scientific method. It is merely a belief.
Of course, there is nothing wrong with having beliefs, especially if there is a wealth of evidence to support them, but they should not be presented as scientific fact. As we have shown, in the case of progressive evolution, there is a wealth of evidence against it. Nevertheless, we are told by evolutionist zealots that microbes to man evolution is a fact and likewise the spontaneous generation of life from sterile matter. They are deliberately misleading the public on both counts. Evolution is not only not a fact, it is not even proper science.

You don't need a degree in rocket science to understand that Darwinism has damaged and undermined science.
However, what does the world's, most famous, rocket scientist (the father of modern rocket science) have to say?

Wernher von Braun (1912 – 1977) PhD Aerospace Engineering
"In recent years, there has been a disturbing trend toward scientific dogmatism in some areas of science. Pronouncements by notable scientists and scientific organizations about "only one scientifically acceptable explanation" for events which are clearly outside the domain of science -- like all origins are -- can only destroy the curiosity of those who must carry on the future work of science. Humility, a seemingly natural product of studying nature, appears to have largely disappeared -- at least its visibility is clouded from the public's viewpoint.
Extrapolation backward in time until there are no physical artifacts of certainty that can be examined, requires sophisticated guessing which scientists prefer to refer to as "inference." Since hypotheses, a product of scientific inference, are virtually the stuff that comprises the cutting edge of scientific progress, inference must constantly be nurtured. However, the enthusiasm that encourages inference must be matched in degree with caution that clearly differentiates inference from what the public so readily accepts as "scientific fact." Failure to keep these two factors in balance can lead either to a sterile or a seduced science. 'Science but not Scientists' (2006) p.xi"

And the eminent scientist, William Robin Thompson (1887 - 1972) Entomologist and Director of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Ottawa, Canada, who was asked to write the introduction of the centenary edition of Darwin's 'Origin', wrote:
"The concept of organic Evolution is very highly prized by biologists, for many of whom it is an object of genuinely religious devotion, because they regard it as a supreme integrative principle. This is probably the reason why the severe methodological criticism employed in other departments of biology has not yet been brought to bear against evolutionary speculation." 'Science and Common Sense' (1937) p.229

“As we know, there is a great divergence of opinion among biologists … because the evidence is unsatisfactory and does not permit any certain conclusion. It is therefore right and proper to draw the attention of the non-scientific public to
the disagreements about evolution. But some recent remarks of evolutionists show that they think this unreasonable.
This situation, where scientific men rally to the defence of a doctrine they are unable to define scientifically, much less demonstrate with scientific rigor, attempting to maintain its credit with the public by the suppression of criticism and the elimination of difficulties, is abnormal and unwise in science.”
Prof. W. R. Thompson, F.R.S., introduction to the 1956 edition of Darwin's 'Origin of the Species'

"When I was asked to write an introduction replacing the one prepared a quarter of a century ago by the distinguished Darwinian, Sir Anthony Keith [one of the "discoverers" of Piltdown Man], I felt extremely hesitant to accept the invitation . . I am not satisfied that Darwin proved his point or that his influence in scientific and public thinking has been beneficial. If arguments fail to resist analysis, consent should be withheld and a wholesale conversion due to unsound argument must be regarded as deplorable. He fell back on speculative arguments.

"He merely showed, on the basis of certain facts and assumptions, how this might have happened, and as he had convinced himself he was able to convince others.

"But the facts and interpretations on which Darwin relied have now ceased to convince.

"This general tendency to eliminate, by means of unverifiable speculations, the limits of the categories Nature presents to us is the inheritance of biology from The Origin of Species. To establish the continuity required by the theory, historical arguments are invoked, even though historical evidence is lacking. Thus are engendered those fragile towers of hypothesis based on hypothesis, where fact and fiction intermingle in an inextricable confusion."—*W.R. Thompson, "Introduction," to Everyman’s Library issue of Charles Darwin, Origin of Species (1958 edition).

"The evolution theory can by no means be regarded as an innocuous natural philosophy, but rather is a serious obstruction to biological research. It obstructs—as has been repeatedly shown—the attainment of consistent results, even from uniform experimental material. For everything must ultimately be forced to fit this theory. An exact biology cannot, therefore, be built up."—*H. Neilsson, Synthetische Artbildng, 1954, p. 11

Berkeley University law professor, Philip Johnson, makes the following points: “(1) Evolution is grounded not on scientific fact, but on a philosophical belief called naturalism; (2) the belief that a large body of empirical evidence supports evolution is an illusion; (3) evolution is itself a religion; and, (4) if evolution were a scientific hypothesis based on rigorous study of the evidence, it would have been abandoned long ago.”

Video clip:
Famous, militant atheist, Richard Dawkins tries to define 'nothing' as 'something', and is surprised and shocked when the audience sensibly reacts with laughter.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6H9XirkhZY

Dr James Tour - 'The Origin of Life' - Abiogenesis decisively refuted.
youtu.be/B1E4QMn2mxk

FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE
The Law of Cause and Effect. Dominant Principle of Classical Physics. David L. Bergman and Glen C. Collins
www.thewarfareismental.net/b/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b...

"The Big Bang's Failed Predictions and Failures to Predict: (Updated Aug 3, 2017.) As documented below, trust in the big bang's predictive ability has been misplaced when compared to the actual astronomical observations that were made, in large part, in hopes of affirming the theory."
kgov.com/big-bang-predictions

Taken on: May 24, 2017

Tags:

Darwinism has failed

Darwin College

Richard Dawkins

Stephen Fry

Lawrence Krauss

skeptics in the pub

skeptic magazine

Sir David Attenborough

secular humanist

the friendly atheist

the God Delusion

Ken Ham

the science guy

Bill Nye

atheist woodstock

Atheist Foundation of Australia

Secular Student Alliance

British Humanist Association

BPAS

bill nye the science guy

FFRS

RDFRS

QED con

Sam Harris

Carl Sagan

Bertrand Russell

rebecca newberger goldstein

Christopher Hitchens

Susan Jacoby

Peter Singer

Peter Tatchell

think week

American humanists

American Humanist Association

American Life League

camp quest

science camp

national day of reason

London School of Economics

Oxford Humanists

James O'Brien

LBC radio

BBC radio

the Guardian newspaper

BBC television

natural history museum

the Daily Mail

Isaac Asimov

PZ Myers

James Randi

professor Brian Cox

professor Stephen Hawking

Stephen Hawking

liberal fascism

SitP

Pompey Skeptics

38 degrees

Russell Brand

Voltaire lecture

Jeremy Corbyn

american atheists

out campaign

Eddie Izzard

science guy

losers

Ricky Gervais

truth in science « less

Sets appears in: • New World Order/Globalism • Christianity more » • The evolution scam • Atheism - the religion of naturalism. « less

Groups appears in: • Photojournalism • Controversial more » • Religious Free-For-All • political views • UK Flickr users • Conservative wingnuts • Free Speech on FLICK • Global Photojournalism • !FlickrSoup for Soul • Protests, Political Art, Democracy, Social Change • #flickr • iFlickr • Religion • Flickritis: over 87,000 waiting for a vaccine. • anything is ok • Global Conversation • Alternative News • 1000 Views • The Bilderberg Group • Human Rights • Science Nerd Depot • A different point of view! • One Thousand • Freedom • Anything But Monkeys! • Progressive Photojournalism • DEMOCRACY and WORLD ORDER • Changing Democracy and World Order • 500 Views • Christians in this World • 100 Views • FlickrToday (only 1 pic per day) • 400 views • 2500 Views • 600 views or more • 700 Views • 600 Views • 800 views (-900) • 900 Views (-1000) • European History • ANYTHING ALLOWED!!!!!! • 600_views...NO: Porn Or nudity !!! No more than 799 views at tim • 1300 views • 3000 Views • Only 1000 • Photojournalism & Photojournalists • People of Faith • Political Compass • Favorites: 5 • Project 365 • anything • Christian • Anything Goes No Limits • Intelligent Design • Politics on FLICKR with Free Speech • Libertarians • 5000+ Views (3 per day) • *** 2000 Photostream Views *** (Max 5 per month) • !Social Issues • Anything Goes....But Your Toes!!!! • 250 views (no second life! - only photos! - no poor quality) • 1900 Views (-2000) • 1600 Views (-1700) • flickr 1k! • 1700 Views (-1800) • `No Rules! • Views: 5000 • *Really Unlimited* • Evolution • 'Views: 901 - 1000 • 'Views: 1000 - 1250 • 900 View Club (Max 999 Views) • A MILLION FLICKS • The Flikr Group • Religions • A Global Perspective • 10 Million Photos • Protest • * Religion * • ANYTHING & EVERYTHING PHOTOGRAPHIC / NO SL/AI • 52 Weeks • Everything! • views 11 • views 1111 • Freedom of Speech • ::Flickr IS my blog:: • 100+ Views OR 10+ Favorites • And • minimum 500 views • minimum 700 views • minimum 250 views • minimum 1000 views • minimum 2000 views • minimum 3000 views • minimum 4000 views • minimum 5000 views • Anything at all • 5000 VIEWS(must have 5,000 views) • minimum 1500 views • !!!Everything!!!Every Photo!!! • Darwinism • 1600 Views • 1700 Views • Global Political Concensus • 'Views: 2000 - 2500 • 'Views: 2500 - 3000 • 'Views: 3000 - 4000 • 'Views: 4000 - 5000 • 100 Million Photos • Have Ye Not Read? • ! ART & PHOTOGRAPHY ! All artistic works welcome • Matters of Justice • BACK TO GOD!! • Flickr conservatives unite!!! • Britain Sucks • Club 400 • Club 600 • 1 day we'll have the most photos on Flickr • Multifaith • 150 views 300views • Viewed 1000 - 1500 (open minded) • Viewed 1500 - 2000 (open minded) • Viewed 2000 - 2500 (open minded) • Politics in Action • Viewed 4000 - 5000 (open minded) • Viewed 5000 - 10.000 (open minded) • all photo • "I AM TELLING YOU A STORY HERE. CAN YOU SEE IT?" • DEMOCRACY-FREEDOM-FOR-ALL • Politics & religion • 1billionPhotos • *LIFE* • Love , Peace & Freedom • Revolution For Evolution • About Religion • Christian Inspiration • Flickr Crazy - Don't Get Cured, Stay Flickr Crazy! • Flickr Elite Group • A Shot a Day ... Or So • Religions of the World • V1000 • V5000 • V2000 • V3000 • UK Politics • All Things Kick Ass • Rational Thought • Creationism • Click! P1-C2 • Anything and Everything 2 • Questions about God • Civil Rights • bilderberg awareness group • 600 • American Pride • 1000+ Views (no people) • 4000 +Views • 5 Million Photos • Christian Communication Centre • anything you what • ALL Welcome - I am sick of 'rules and regulations - New Contest • Anything You Like • *Flickr - 1,5 million photos* We need all your pics !!!* • THE TRUTH • GLOBAL PEACE GLOBAL HEALING • World In Crisis: U.S. & World Political Debate • "Unlimited Photos: No Rules" • 365 Days Project • Save America • Fight Club - Politics & Society (project mayhem) • FREE EARTH - FREE PEOPLE © • TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL • The Republican Party • Vista: 2000 • NowPublic • Why Hillary Rodham Clinton my First Choice? • GODS CREATION • 1.000.000.000 photos/videos • Anti-Global Warming/ Anti-Climate Change • 1,000,000 Photos • Anything and everything!! • ! ♡ Flickrian ♡ No Rules:) Feel Free to invite your Friends! • Anything here • 1000+ views • New Flickr of Hope • WE ARE CREATIVE PEOPLE! • Anything English • Anything, Anytime, Anywhere • Anything flickr • God Conservatives, God Americans • Science Museum Lates • christianity • Dissolving the Veil • FLICKR HAPPY -(P.1-com. 3) NEW 8th COMP. • Flickrspace • 800 Views • Pics with 1500 Views • Pics with 1600 Views • Pics with 1800 Views • Pics with 2000 Views • Pics with 1700 Views • Pics with 2500 Views • A Quiet Revolt • CNN iReport • Be A H.E.R.O.: Human & Equal Rights Organizers • BBC Around The World In 80 Faiths • Free and Equal • Faith in One God " Fe en Un Dios " • God !!! Where Are You ? • Christians on Flickr • Christians of the World (Share Your Ministry) • ! Flickr Cafe ! • Anglican • LORD GOD • Amazing Bokeh ***No Rules, No Banning, No Sweepers*** • Anything & Everything • Darwin Day • Alternative Views • >2000 • Faith through Photography • Photo Unlimited • The Political Forum • world of flickr • Tea Party Movement • a new world • Photography for God • .this is my truth: meaning so many things • Anything and Everything! • 50 MILLION PHOTOS • Global Protest • Gods World ~ Through my eyes • anything everything • ! The Flickr ! • FLICKR PALS • ANYTHING AT ALL! • Religion.. • A DEBATE • ***Flickr Global • American Gods • For His Glory • anything goes club • Christian Artists • All American Tea Parties • Flickr Social Club • To God Be The Glory • I am the Lord Jesus Christ ( true, true ) • Flicks 1000 • Fresh Conservatives • Christianity For A Purpose • anything everything photography • CHRISTIAN PHOTOS -ARTWORK-DESIGN-ARTS-DIGITAL ART • Anything you would show your Grandparents. • Anything & Everything //No post Limit! • Science Communication • religions and religious - religiones y religiosos • FLICKERIANS • Christians-R-Us! • THE ( WORLD ) POLITICS GROUP: LIBERTY IS YOURS ENJOY • build your faith • Christian Destiny • 1800 Views • God in our lives! • 1 billion photos • Evolution - A Religion By Any Other Name • New Age To Jesus • 2600 views (-2700) • Time To Wake The Hell Up • [][][]Not only Facebook[][][] • US and World Politics • Christian Help • Just any group • Anything as well as everything • pics of anything • Christians with a purpose • Creation explored • All photos group • Photography Blogger • Liberty Activism Media • anything ! • All kinds of everything(UK) • Anything I mean anything • 3000-3500 Views • 3500-4000 Views • 200-300 Views • 2500-3000 Views • 3200 Views • 1000-1500 Views • 900-1000 Views • 800-900 Views • 3300 Views • 3400 Views • Everything&Anything • 3500 Views • 4000-4500 Views • 1500-2000 Views • U.S. Politics and the World; Political Discourse • Religion in America • 4000 Views • London's National History Museum • 2000-2500 Views • ammoforJesus • 4 The Glory of God • 10 Million MORE Photos • Art and Faith • 100 MILLION PHOTOS !!!!! • ` FLICKR ´ • Him • STOP THE NEW WORLD ORDER • All Faiths & Religions • Universal Art • Anything Anywhere • For God's People • flickr (unofficial) • 750 Views Unlimited • Our True Religion • Anything You Like!! • ☪ ✝ ☸ Religions ✡ ☬ ☯ • political news • [][][] Modern Times [][][] • 4000 views and more • Science Everywhere Everyday • Libertarian Party • CHRISTIANS FOR LIFE AND GOD • flickr every day! • 100 Views Unlimited • the culture of humanity • 200 Views Unlimited • 1,000 Views Unlimited 1000 • 5,000 Views Unlimited 5000 • 500 Views Unlimited • 2,000 Views Unlimited 2000 • ***Flickr-New Hope Group • 4,000 Views Unlimited 4000 • 300 Views Unlimited • 400 Views Unlimited • 3,000 Views Unlimited 3000 • 800 Views Unlimited • 900 Views Unlimited • 600 Views Unlimited • 700 Views Unlimited • All of Flickr!:)♥ • anything you wish... • FREEDOM AND ART • !*ALL ARE WELCOME*! • 4000 • anything & everything nothing nude or nasty • Huffington Post Photo • Submit Anything • beatifulgeographies • !*Flickr All Stars*! • fotografia sem limites unlimited photo • A New Way of Seeing Things • all photos for all • -- IMMAGINI DAL MONDO -- • 2.000 / 2000 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 5.000 / 5000 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • .FLICKR WORLD. • Group for all users of FLICKR - No 30/60 Groups Limit • 3.000 / 3000 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 500 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 1.000 / 1000 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 300 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 100 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • * just photos * no rules please use comment code appreciated • True Christians: Making a positive difference for GOD'S KINGDOM • 400 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • 200 views at least (NO LIMITS, NO 30/60) • Any Way the Wind Blows • 4500 views minimum - no 30/60 - no SL • .FLICKR GOLD. • TRUE FOLLOWERS OF GOD!! • Christian Advocates • Faithful Followers of JESUS CHRIST • Believers & Faithful Followers of JESUS CHRIST • A. VIEWPOINT. • 150 Views • Views 2.000 • 2000 View Group • 300 Group Unlimited • .FLICKR THE BEGINNING. • 400 View Group • 300 Views Group • Anything on flickr no rules • Famous Christian Book Author Exposes Feminism As Witchcraft! • the U! « less

Stats: 39,340 views / 7 comments